But if you are making a site for a free service that isnt trying to sell it, then you should probably choose the format you are most familiar with. Sure, if your site uses a proprietary format, it would be better to encode it. It’s a matter of how we choose to encode our site. So what are we going to do about the debate? It’s not just a matter of which format is better. But most people are pretty familiar with one format or another. Some people write in the 8-bit binary format, others in the ASCII format. And that you have a good reason for doing that.Įncoding is something that I always find to be a contentious issue. But if you think its important to have some kind of text-based encoding, then you should make sure your site is readable, even if you didnt want people to read it for free. So when I go to a website, I expect it to be read in the same way I expect it to be read. When we put up the site, we wanted to get people to read it for free, so we had to pay for it. In fact, some of us don’t have a problem with the search engines. The reason for this is that we don’t want our customers to read a website for free for the first time. But when people try to read the site in Safari (or Chrome or Firefox) they get an error. For example, we put up the text using a.com extension because that is what many people would expect.
We put up all the text, pictures, and audio files in a format that we expect our patrons to read and understand. The hope is that it will improve the user experience, but we also don’t want to make it impossible to read. We’re trying to figure out a way to make it easier for our patrons to read the site and learn what we’ve put up. One of the things we’re working on is encoding. I’m not sure if you’re aware, but we’re doing a lot of work on the site right now.
0 kommentar(er)
